My design link should be at:
bcts-potomac.aacc.edu/128b/10/week5/designzip.zip
About this assignment,
It was a good assignment for becoming familiar with various parts of the Fireworks program. The one thing I found difficult was matching the fonts. Is there a good way to find a match? There are so many of them, it’s mind boggling.
Regarding the article by Jakob Nielsen, Top Ten Mistakes in Web Design:
Mistake #1: Bad Search – I’m assuming he’s talking about the search engines vs our website design. Should we be putting keywords with common misspellings? Also, the search engines do tend to return a “Did you mean ____? when you misspell a word.
Mistake #2: PDF Files. I totally agree with him here. I hate PDF files.
Mistake #3: Changing Color of Visited Links. I’ve found that even when websites do change the color of visited sites, they don’t all change. For instance, when there are many links and you click on each one, several will turn purple, but one stays blue. This is confusing and I’m not sure why it happens.
Mistake #4: Non-scannable text. Sometimes it’s necessary, but generally I agree.
Mistake #5: Fixed Font Size. I wasn’t aware you could change the size of the font. It’s a nice idea, especially for the very small font.
Mistake #6: Low Search Engine Visibility. Do the search engines nowadays search through the web pages to find results? In the old days (a couple years ago), my husband had to send his keywords to each search engine.
Mistake #7: Advertisement appearance. I agree with this. I tend to avoid anything resembling an ad.
Mistake #8: Consistency. I agree with him here. Consistency is key in writing for print as well as online.
Mistake #9: Opening New Browser Windows. I agree with not wanting mega-windows opening on the user; however, I like the idea of opening a new window when going outside the site (agree with professor here).
Mistake #10: User’s questions. I agree. A lot of times I will go to a website looking for prices and they’re not listed.
Regarding the Webpages That Suck website by Vincent Flanders, specifically “The 10 Worst Web Sites to Navigate in 2006″ :
I thought the ads that came up at the top were part of the site. Also, once you click on a link you can’t get back to his site.
Diner’s Club: archive.org The doors are interesting – they should be consistent – either be new links or all the same as the top buttons. It’s not intuitive that the doors are buttons. New site still takes too long to open.
Shulman Fleming: Tjere’s nothing wrong with using a baby. The baby signifies growth. I kept staring at the screen expecting something to come forward. Finally I realized the side bar would open when rolled over – agree, not a good design.
Matthew Mahon: Takes too long to open. Can’t get back to original site.
Campbell Mithum: Search is important
Medium: Not good.
Sjb: Navigation should be very user friendly and intuitive, not fancy.
When designing a website, is there a way to make sure that if someone clicks an outside link, they can get back to yours. This is important for your business and frustrating when you have to keep entering the business address again and again. Also when the user opens a site, that site should open on top, not be buried down deep in the open windows. These are comments relating to the “The 10 Worst Web Sites to Navigate in 2006″ website.
ushida findlay architects. When I opened this website in a small window, it appeared blank. Not so good.
Gaiai Group. same as above
Crumpler Bags. Very cute, but I can’t read the words that pop down from the pictures on top. Text that pops up with pictures on bottom are more readable. Should use consistency and be readable. Also takes too long to open.
Optimal World. What does the countdown mean? not intuitive.
Chapter 2 is in last week’s assignment.